
But count me among the throngs who were inspired to a journalism career early on by Broder’s reverence for politics at a time when it still seemed to be an honorable calling and his belief in shoe-leather reporting. For a time, Broder’s radical middle-of-the-roadism was the epitome of conventional wisdom, back when that phrase was honorable, too. He was the most knowledgeable and one of the more decent practitioners of political journalism – and I liked his straightforward writing style, which of course is harder to pull off than a 750-word Willsian pusillanimous screed that no one can understand.
Although I knew at the end that his columns would be the most boring on the op-ed page, they were still full of information and perspective and remained a must-read.
No comments:
Post a Comment