Friday, October 03, 2008

Winkin’, Stinkin’ and Pods

Having established that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is Col. Klink’s doppelganger, I am now convinced that Sarah Palin is Sgt. Schultz. Except we knew that Schultz did know the score and was only covering his hide when would proclaim: "I hear nothing, I see nothing, I know nothing!"

The other person that came to mind was Chance, the gardner, the doofus played by Peter Sellers in the 1979 movie, “Being There,” who knows nothing about the world except what he has watched on TV. By a series of happenstances that only life could exceed (the ascendance of Sarah Palin), this slow-witted cliché machine becomes the toast of the power elite for his perceived wisdom.

Sarah Palin, however, is scary. Not because of her politics, particularly, but because of her looks. Yeah. Her looks. Wide-eyed and oblivious to the wreckage of all around her, programmed like a Chatty Cathy and as real as one of those pod people in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” her presence anywhere is testament to why John McCain should not be president and why, if he is, he should be surrounded by bubble wrap and propped up like the guy in Weekend at Bernie’s if something should happen to him.

I will accept a lot in a politician, even a pretty smart cookie like Joe Biden who referred, cringeingly, to certain residents of the Balkans as "Bosniaks." But but I will not abide a vice president who winks instead of thinks.

I won’t go into the lies she told during the vice presidential debate because they are too numerous and not really important. We know she is criminally ignorant and terminally dishonest, and so, thankfully, does the nation. Her talking points, as Keith Olbermann pointed out tonight, in a split-screen demonstration, were the same ones used by George Bush during his 1980 campaign. Word for word.

But she outdoes Bushitler in some ways, for instance, enunciating "Never Again!" in response to the mortgage bailout. "Never Again" is a watchword. A watchword among Jews who will never be silent again when bullyboy crackpots start spreading hate and fear. To say what she did, and to later refer to a Holocaust, marginalizes the real one. But what the hell. She knows nothing.

But it is pretty interesting that she refuses to answer questions she doesn’t want to, but isn't that exactly what most people don’t like about – um, Washington politicians?

I read the transcript, and nothing she said was honest, sincere or truthful. Not even "Nice to meet you” to Biden. The only thing she shared with him was the stage.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous1:45 PM

    You said :-

    "Sarah Palin, however, is scary. Not because of her politics, particularly, but because of her looks. Yeah. Her looks. Wide-eyed and oblivious to the wreckage of all around her, programmed like a Chatty Cathy and as real as one of those pod people in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” her presence anywhere is testament to why John McCain should not be president and why, if he is, he should be surrounded by bubble wrap and propped up like the guy in Weekend at Bernie’s if something should happen to him."


    I think what is really scary, for all of us, not just the US - is that a Vice President can simply be selected by a candidate without any reference to any wider mandate, and this becomes the next leader of the western world should the candidate win the election and die in office. That is really scary, especially when its someone like Palin.

    Its especially important that America has the best elected leadership available and this seems to be a loophole in an otherwise reasonably sound system (hanging chad not withstanding)

    In the British system, the Prime Minister chooses his Deputy but that Deputy only holds the reins (in the event of death or resignation of the PM) until the parliamentary party in government has held an internal election for a new leader -which may or may not be the Deputy (and usually it isnt)

    Having had examples in the past like Agnew, Quayle and now possibly Palin, there surely needs to be some change to the process, in the event of death, impeachment or resignation of the President, to allow the President's party (whether or not they control Congress) to select a permanent acceptable replacement

    Brian F --England

    ReplyDelete